Jump to content
GTA RP
...
MALDEN LIFE
...
TEAMSPEAK
...

Samantha

Staff Team
  • Posts

    375
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Reputation

351 Cement Miner

About Samantha

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Recent Profile Visitors

7314 profile views
  1. I very much apologise for it taking so long, I was very busy these last couple days. I will try keep it as sweet and short as possible. @JustHamzaPK I think you are aware of what the issue is here. It does not matter at all what previous interactions you guys did or didn´t have - you should have brought it up when it happened instead of pulling a taser while being held at gunpoint. Your actions clearly go against rule G2.4, nothing more to say. @mdog Quite frankly, I do not believe your story of it being a bug and think that you intentionally locked the car. BUT I will give you the benefit of the doubt this once, do not waste the opportunity! Although we might have decided that locking your car while downed does not fall under exploiting, it can still very much fall under rule C1.7 - Use common sense next time. Last but not least, @Gecko_, although I can not see anything wrong with the hostage taking attempt itself, @mdogdid not seem involved with the initial situation and shooting him WHILE telling him to get out of there seemed a little... well off. Looks to me like you are walking on a very thin line there and should make sure to read up on rule G1.2 once more. I also would like to point out that prior bickering, ingame or OOC, is of no interest in reports unless it contributes to the situation at hand. If there is no evidence of that being the case, then it does not. Period. All 3 of you will be let off easy today by each recieving a warning under the above metioned rules. Let this be a lesson learned - do not repeat it. Alternative action taken.
  2. Please quote me the rule you broke and explain, in your own words, why it is in place.
  3. Thank you for filling me in on staff decisions. However, staff has also decided in the past that situations are being dealt with on a case to case basis and that there will not be a "one fits all".
  4. @JustHamzaPKunfortunately that is neither in your nor their power to decide. I am merely offering that they get the chance to defend themselfs before I action this report.
  5. Hello there. The player in question is already perm banned for a similar offence, this however will be added to their notes. When it comes to other players involved, I am not for sure able to identify them with the provided evidence. Approved. Thank you for doing your part in keeping the community clean. Your report has been approved and action has been taken against the reported player. If you are out of pocket due to this case please now open a compensation request here, Do make sure to mention this report.
  6. Hello there. Apologies for it taking a while, Staff is fairly busy. It is obvious that Candice did not at all value her life in this situation and that this is a clear breach of rule G2.4 Since Candice is already banned for other rulebreaks, this will be added to her records. Approved. Thank you for doing your part in keeping the community clean. Your report has been approved and action has been taken against the reported player. If you are out of pocket due to this case please now open a compensation request here, Do make sure to mention this report.
  7. Hello there. When it comes to the claims of RDM, as you said yourself, the evidence is not sufficient. Locking the car when down is something that will be judged on a situational basis and in this case I don´t see quality RP going along with it. The breach of rule G4.4 is out of question and after checking the logs it became aparent that he did indeed combat log. Therefore the player will receive a permanent ban. Thank you for doing your part in keeping the community clean. Your report has been approved and action has been taken against the reported player. If you are out of pocket due to this case please now open a compensation request here, Do make sure to mention this report.
  8. Hello there. Since this whole situation seems to have a little more to it than shows, I would like some longer footage of this and, if available, also of the situations taken as reference in the comments. Furthermore @JustHamzaPKit would be helpfull if you happen to remember who the person accused of exploiting is and advise them to give their explaination too.
  9. Alright. Sorry it took so long, I was fairly busy. Let´s start off with just the observation of the footage on a basic level. Do I personally like seeing people being "punched" into place? Nope. But considering the fact that every situation is generally judged on seperately, I also feel strongly that I am missing context to the situation beforehand to properly make a call. Let´s say it this way: There is a reason as to why people have the option to refuse being carried. There is also a reason as to why it is possible to put someone in a car without carrying them. Both of these options are valid to be used but also come with conditions. They are not to be executed with poor RP or any other ill intentions that do not connect to the RP scenario at hand. This being said, neither of you have longer footage to give me more of an insight, therefore I will not further comment on the accusation of powergaming. Now on to the claims of G3.1 and G3.3: @YacobBarbaryou are lucky that there is no evidence of anyone acting upon the information you have given OOC. I highly encourage you to refrain from doing so, as it will for sure have consequences for you next time. Consider this your only warning. With all of the above said, this report will be declined due to lack of evidence. Thank you for your report, Unfortunately, it has been declined The staff member will advise shortly why on this occasion they have declined to take action against the reported player. Please do not let this put you off making further reports in the future, We rely on our player base to help keep our community clean.
  10. Can either of you provide a longer video please? @YacobBarbar @Queen_Priya
  11. Thank you for putting so much into this community! Due to this place being around, I found a lot of amazing people and my life became so much happier... I will be forever grateful to this community and everyone that kept it going for so long! Although I did not really have the pleasure to get to know you, it´s a shame to see you go. Lots of love and only the best for your future! You´ve got this bud
  12. Your report is currently being reviewed, Please be patient while the evidence is reviewed Please keep checking this report regularly just in case the reviewing staff member has any questions Thank you for your report and you doing your part to keep our community clean! @beckswould you like to contribute to this report made against you?
  13. Hello. The player in question has already been permantely banned for similar offences. However, this will be added to their record. Approved. Thank you for doing your part in keeping the community clean. Your report has been approved and action has been taken against the reported player. If you are out of pocket due to this case please now open a compensation request here, Do make sure to mention this report.
  14. Hello. From the footage you have provided, it looks like this was said and done within the RP scenario. As you mentioned yourself: Things said in roleplay, stay in roleplay. The characters you create in our community stay in-game. Anything out of game can and will be dealt with. If it is requested that someone stops using words or phrases of that kind, they are expected to stop. These cases are handled one by one, depending on the context and in this particular scenario, I do not see an out of character connection or the intend to personally attack anyone. Since the record of the player in question is fairly clean so far, I will hand out a warning to choose words more wisely in future, otherwise there might be harsher punishments handed out. Considering the metagaming, it is very hard to prove and I don´t have any context on it from the provided footage. Therefore, I can not act on anything anyway. Alternative action taken. Your report has been dealt with, but perhaps not in the way you originally envisaged. Whether this is beneficial or disadvantageous to you will depend entirely on the situation, and staff will have taken the most-appropriate action in the circumstances.
  15. Good day. First off, continuous evidence is very much requested so please try to provide that on future reports. When it comes to the combat log, I have found the owner of the car but that does not mean it is the person comitting the rulebreak. Without clear evidence of who it actually is, my hands are tied. Keys could have been passed on ect., meaning it could have literally been anyone driving the car at the time. Metagaming is something that is very difficult to prove and the provided evidence doesn´t give me much on that. There could be metagaming involved but it also could not be. Something that I don´t like here tho, is the fact that you used the phrases "I´ve got everything on body cam", "He will be deported" and "Combat logging and metagaming" within roleplay. Those are clearly threats to report and thus a breach of C1.14. I get it, situations can be frustrating. But it doesn´t justify breaking rules yourself! Please refrain from using phrases like the above in future or you will find yourself in trouble. Since your record looks fairly clean so far, I will leave it at a slap on the wrist. Denied. Thank you for your report, Unfortunately, it has been declined The staff member will advise shortly why on this occasion they have declined to take action against the reported player. Please do not let this put you off making further reports in the future, We rely on our player base to help keep our community clean.
×
×
  • Create New...