Good morning.
I'm answering on Hunters behalf, with his permission and him asking me to do it for him.
NLR only applies after a respawn – not simply being "downed." In the videos you uploaded here or the clips whatsoever it doesn't show that Hunter respawned.
Let me clarify The G4.4 Rule FOR...
I agree too even though I think some rules need to be reworked or atleast need more depth like Bullying and the rules which have no description/explanation, but of course some are fine as they are.
I also see the point in this but my experience with staff has been only good and I don't think any of them would be as harsh to enforce "straight perm bans" than let's say some weeks or a month if they had the freedom to decide. And while I support the decision of unbiased and neutral...
Which why I said the FBS can still be used but also with addition that Staff can determine themselves if someone deserves to get send to the Forums or just needs a longer break of some weeks. I don't see anything bad with it. There are always people saying their bans are Unfair or bias but those...
(Not a Duplicate but a way way more softer version than my last suggestion)
So from taking a time to look into the report and everything I think for myself that the Fair Ban System is fine, but it shouldn't be something which is set in Stone.
This is just an update to my old suggestion which...
Well, my point was just more autonomy to the Staff about decision making. Making them able to not follow the FBS but also determining on their own if the person who got reported is truly deserving the perma or not. I do see the point that people will complaint 100% but in that case it should be...
For me it feels like it every time i look at the report section that all the time only the FBS is being followed, instead of staff doing their own decisions, which looks for me like that the FBS is set in stone and that no alternative punishments can be given out. But I can be wrong too.
So more of a play field for staff to decide whether it's gonna be a perm 1 week 1 month and so on I like that idea. But yeah maybe a radical change like "removal of the whole system" is a bit too much but I still think they should get more room to decide about it and not like currently where the...
For me RDM is not RDM like you can't generalize it, there are trollers just stabbing you at pillbox, or just a simple misunderstanding which made you get killed or make you kill someone which imo should be decided by staff what the penalty should be and not a system which you're forced to...
I know it's not hard to not get banned I've been banned too for something really stupid easily avoidable.
But I think I see a valid reason still that staff should also be able to have more freedom within giving bans. Like when someone does RDM after 5 months he'll still be permed even maybe...
What about the staff doing bans on their own when they see better behaviour from a person? Because 6 MONTHS is still a lot. Don't get me wrong the system is good - okay but i still see some flaws in it. Especially with the side that staff cant determine themselves if they give someone a...
''Our ban system has transitioned from a permanent ban system to an automated timed ban system where the ban length and rule number will be listed in the ban reason. These bans will automatically expire at the time given in the ban reason, for that reason we will not be accepting ban appeals for...
Character Name: Miyoko Hunter
Character ID: 1113530
Steam ID: 76561198202650124
Game: GTA RP
Date: Feb 18, 2025
Please Provide Full Details: So I played Casino and then I lost 100k casino blackjack chips I pressed stand and i thought since it worked the first time that i can just bet and it...