Search results

Due to the age of the ban, I won't be asking you to recall the whats and whys of the situation. What I willsay is this. I'll give an unban in this situation with the following conditions. Any bans in the next 6 months will put you back on a permanent ban (As per FBS) Any bans for combat...

I'll be totally honest here. I'm failing to see any accountability on your part. And trying to get answers, feels like getting blood from a stone. We aren't here to spoon feed unban appeals through their process. You can have another attempt at your appeal in the new year. Timed out until...

Thats not how unban appeals work. We look for reassurance that these things wont happen again in the future. How do you plan on mitigating the risk of transferring assets?

Completed as per above conditions Approved

I'm willing to entertain the appeal, but there are conditions. Any bans within 6 months will land you back on a permanent ban (As per FBS) All characters will be deleted to allow for a fresh start If you agree to the above, I will process the appeal. @shaun1_unban

You'vedisplayed a lack of honesty since the inception of this ban. As such, I'm not willing to allow you back yet. Timed out until 28/1/2026 In the next appeal, bring honesty or the time out will be extended. Denied

you've not really touched on to the ban reasons in this appeal. Try again in the new year with a fresh, more thorough outlook. Timed out until 11/1/2026 Denied

https://www.roleplay.co.uk/threads/report-a-player-536-gta-rp.406812/#comment-767126 Here's why you were banned. Please take another swing at the appeal in a few weeks. Timed out until 28/1/2026. Denied

It was a good run Terry, but the general consensus is that no mistakes were made. Therefore further appeals are off the table. Denied

Whilst I do believe there is a level of remorse in this appeal, and an understanding of the rulebreak. I also believe that additional time away from the server is required. Just so we're all on the same page of why this language is un acceptable. I will apply a time out until 11/1/2026. I hope...

Lack of effort Denied

With your history being taken into account, I feel that you can't be trusted to operate within the confines of RPUK's ruleset. Character Separation Multiple metagaming bans OOC Abuse Asset Transferring Common Sense These are all avoidable and are difficult to happen without a certain mindset...

In the last 4 months, you've gone from a clean record, to 2 serious permanent bans. You've lied to staff in the past. You've shown yourself to be somewhat capable at concealing the truth. As such, we aren't ready to receive you back. You can appeal after 28/3/2026 Denied

Do you think a simple "I wont do it again" is ample evidence, that you wont return to rule breaks if we grant an unban?

You've taken zero accountability for the blatant rule break in the report. You've then tried to deflect the blame on to others. I do not subscribe to the DARVO approach exhibited in this appeal. As such I'm adding a cooldown until 28/3/2026. Rethink your approach before posting a fresh appeal...

Conditions above Approved

Your history is working against you here Barry. I'm going to time this appeal out until the new year. I want you to re-write the appeal with more detail, and i want a break down of the rule breaks individually. Appeal after 11/1/2026 Denied

Hello @Billy Jenkins . First off the bat, I'm going to be honest, this appeal isn't great, and normally I'd just deny it as it seems to lack much effort. But I'm in a good mood and I'm recognising that this isn't the first attempt. I'm willing to push the unban. However there are caveats. Any...

I'm not convinced by the appeal that you've actually made any changes to your approach. I feel that you would return to the server and fall into old habits. You've been banned permanently 4 times. 3 of which are for ooc reasons. As such, this will be the last appeal we entertain. Effectively...

I'm unsure what was unclear about your previous appeal, but I will echo the statement made. "DENIED NO FURTHER APPEALS" This has not changed. Denied